Posted October 22, 2026 - by Law Offices of J.Chrisp
Founding Attorney
If a drunk driver caused a crash that hurt you in Sonoma or Napa County, you can generally bring a civil claim against that driver, and punitive damages may be possible. The Law Offices of J. Chrisp serves people injured in Sonoma and Napa counties. The consultation is free, there is no fee unless we win, and 877-J-CHRISP (877-524-7477) is answered 24/7.
Punitive damages may be possible, but they are not automatic. Under Civil Code section 3294, they may be recovered in addition to actual damages when it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant acted with malice, oppression or fraud. They are meant to punish the defendant and set an example. The statute defines malice to include despicable conduct carried on with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. In Taylor v. Superior Court (1979), the California Supreme Court held that driving while intoxicated may constitute malice under section 3294 if done in conscious disregard of the probable dangerous consequences.
A criminal DUI case is prosecuted in the name of the People of the State of California (Penal Code section 684). The district attorney is the public prosecutor, except as otherwise provided by law (Government Code section 26500). A civil injury claim is a separate kind of case. The injured person brings it to recover money damages from the person at fault (Civil Code section 3281).
Except where the law provides otherwise, damages are the amount that will compensate for all the harm the wrongful conduct proximately caused (Civil Code section 3333). Depending on the case, this can include medical expenses, lost earnings, vehicle repair costs and pain and suffering. The uninsured-driver rule below can limit pain and suffering. If your own negligence contributed to the crash, your damages may be reduced in proportion to your share of the negligence (Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975)).
| Criminal DUI case | Civil injury claim | |
|---|---|---|
| Who brings it | The People of the State of California, through a public prosecutor | The injured person |
| What it can lead to | Punishment such as a fine or imprisonment, upon conviction | Money damages from the person at fault |
Being uninsured can limit what you recover. Under Civil Code section 3333.4, a person injured in a motor vehicle crash cannot recover non-economic losses, such as pain and suffering, if either of these applies, except in the situation described next:
One exception applies. An uninsured owner hurt by a driver who was violating Vehicle Code section 23152 or section 23153 (the driving-under-the-influence laws), and was convicted of that offense, is not barred from recovering non-economic losses. The exception is written for owners and does not mention uninsured drivers who did not own the vehicle. Section 3333.4 limits only non-economic losses. It does not limit economic losses such as medical expenses and lost earnings.
Generally, not for serving the alcohol. California law treats drinking the alcohol, not serving it, as the proximate cause of injuries an intoxicated person inflicts on others (Civil Code section 1714(b)). Under Business and Professions Code section 25602, no person who sells, furnishes or gives alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person is civilly liable for injuries caused by the drinker’s intoxication. The rule is not limited to bars. It covers any person who sells, furnishes or gives alcohol in that situation. Under Civil Code section 1714(c), a social host who furnishes alcohol also cannot be held legally accountable for injuries to others resulting from that drinking, except as described below.
The statutes make two exceptions, both involving young drinkers:
The firm serves people injured in Sonoma and Napa counties, including crashes on Highway 12, Highway 29, Highway 121 and the Silverado Trail.
The firm does not have an office in Napa County. Its offices are:
The firm has Spanish-speaking staff.
Generally, yes. A civil claim against the driver can seek damages for the harm the crash caused. Punitive damages may be possible if malice, oppression or fraud is proven by clear and convincing evidence. The claim is separate from the criminal DUI case. Your damages may be reduced if your own negligence contributed to the crash.
Generally, not for serving the alcohol. Under Business and Professions Code section 25602, a person who sells, furnishes or gives alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person is not civilly liable for injuries caused by the drinker’s intoxication. The rule is not limited to bars. Under section 25602.1, a claim may be brought against an alcohol licensee that sold, furnished or gave alcohol to an obviously intoxicated minor, when that was the proximate cause of the injury.
Possibly. Civil Code section 3333.4 bars you from recovering non-economic losses, such as pain and suffering, if you owned a vehicle involved in the crash that was not insured as the law requires, or were driving a vehicle involved in the crash and cannot establish financial responsibility. An uninsured owner hurt by a driver convicted under Vehicle Code section 23152 or 23153 for that driving is not barred. The section does not limit economic losses such as medical expenses.
The Law Offices of J. Chrisp offers a free consultation and works on a contingency fee. There is no fee unless we win.
If you were hit by a drunk driver in Sonoma or Napa County, call the Law Offices of J. Chrisp 24/7 at 877-J-CHRISP (877-524-7477) for a free consultation. There is no fee unless we win.
The Law Offices of J. Chrisp is a Northern California personal injury law firm founded by attorney Jesse Chrisp, who was raised in Lake County. The firm represents injured people, with offices in Lower Lake (main office), Santa Rosa and San Francisco, and serves Sonoma, Napa, Lake and Mendocino counties and the San Francisco Bay Area. Consultations are free, the firm works on a contingency fee with no fee unless the firm wins, and the phone is answered 24/7 at 877-J-CHRISP (877-524-7477). The firm was named to Best Law Firms 2026 (Tier 1, Santa Rosa, Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs). Jesse Chrisp has been recognized by The Best Lawyers in America since 2024 and selected to Super Lawyers from 2023 to 2026.
Santa Rosa Car Accident Lawyer
Hit by an Uninsured Driver in California (link once published)
How Much Is a Car Accident Case Worth in California? (link once published)
Civil Code section 1714, section 3281, section 3294, section 3333 and section 3333.4, California Legislative Information
Business and Professions Code section 25602 and section 25602.1, California Legislative Information
Penal Code section 684 and Government Code section 26500, California Legislative Information
Vehicle Code section 23152 and section 23153, California Legislative Information
Taylor v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 890; Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804
Attorney Advertising. This page provides general information about California law and is not legal advice for any specific situation. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Last updated October 2026.
Since founding his law firm in 2010, Jesse Chrisp has built a reputation as a dedicated personal injury trial attorney serving Northern California’s Bay Area.
He has represented thousands of injured clients and holds the record for the highest personal injury verdict in Lake County. Mr. Chrisp was selected to Northern California Rising Stars from 2013 to 2019, an honor awarded to only 2.5% of attorneys in the state.
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by attorney Jesse Chrisp, who has been continuously recognized as a leader in personal injury law since starting his law firm in 2010.
Simply fill the form out below to request your free consultation and we will be in touch within 24 hours.
or call us at